|
Traditional
|
Alternative*
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| Strength: | Greater susceptibility to damages from natural disasters | Also extremely strong compared to traditional methods | 20% stronger than steel and 5x stronger than traditional SIP plywood |
| Installation: | Cumbersome installation - multiple “sticks” and insulation layers | Easer than traditional methods but more training required | Extremely light weight with minimal labor training required |
| Durability: | Highly susceptible to bug infestation and water damage | Resistant to bug infestation and impermeable to water | Resistant to bug infestation and impermeable to water |
| Permeability: | Not air-tight, which leads to risk of insect infestation | Air-tight construction | Air-tight construction can reduce the risk of disease from insects |
| Thermal Performance | Extremely poor thermal performance | strong performance, but concrete not as optimal | Foam core is one of the most efficient insulation materials available |
| Costs: | Higher costs due to labor | Higher costs due to materials and manufacturing process | 20% the cost of normal construction without sacrificing quality |